DEADLIER WEAPON THAN SHAN BANU OR BABRI MASJID AS PART OF THE SPANISH EXPERIMENT IN INDIA
In the all-round battle against Muslims in the Shah Banu case, Hindu nazis had committed a mistake: they made a direct attack on the Muslims. The first . attack was so pre-emptive that the Muslim leadership was benumbed like the animal sent to the slaughter bouse. But the Muslim masses came out on the streets for a terrible, retaliatory counter-attack. Seeing this the Muslim leadership mustered courage and the nazis ultimately met with a disastrous defeat which in turn benumbed them only.
But the Hindu nazi mind is ingenious. (Know the Hindu Mind, Dalit Sahitya Academy, 1990). it opened its old bag of tricks. It changed the strategy. It started eulogising the Muslim generals of the Shah Banu war, invited them to preside over their seminars, called them great scholars, made them sit on the dais and hear their nonsense for hours, presented them with mementoes and in turn heard very little g 3 from them. Slowly the ‘great generals’ where I brainwashed. Such treatment of enslavement is called x SAAMA treatment in Sanskrit.
Muslim Elite brainwashed: Along with this Brahminical brainwashing of Muslims intelligentsia, they prepared Hindu officials, Hindu media men and Hindu women’s organisations to be ready and wait for the chance and the green signal with directions I to carry on slow, systematic and continuous attacks so that there is: no mass upsurge. They know that Muslim elites can be brainwashed, but the masses can never be and the latter should not be touched.
And them. chance came in the recent Ameena’s I marriage with Yahya, a Saudi national, followed by Rukhsana’s marriage. Thousands of such marriages had taken place all these years but none took notice of it. But this became a suitable time in view of the hostile feelings of the oppressed Muslim masses for. the Saudi regime because of its role in the Gulf War. The most suitable time was not to be missed.
The nazis gave the signal and an Indian Airlines airhostess suddenly fell in love with a young Muslim girl accompanying her elderly husband, dramatized the issue and prosecuted the old man, Arab national, subjecting them and their relatives to o ‘great mental and physical torture, continuously harassed. Even the gazes who performed the nikah . I tortured and disgraced and of course the nazi media systematically expressing its glee in the form of concern.
Common people did not take this news seriously. Thousands of such marriages between elderly men and young and even minor girls to take place in India every day and relatives and friends of both ~ FITERA ~ sides join and celebrate the occasion. The only people making fuss are the nazi-writers who dug out a few more (not even a dozen) old cases and pleased themselves.
What is worrying us? : But what really worried us is the feeling of shame, disgust and helplessness shown by our submissive, frightened and brainwashed Muslim intellectuals and the stoney silence of the torch-bearers of Islam-the Muslim organisations. With the exception of Salahuddin Owaisi, MP of I Hyderabad, one of those few Muslim politicians who studied the Hindu mind. He could see deep into the affair and brushed aside the entire rubbish saying “the cultural and historical affinity between local (Hyderabad) Muslims and Gulf brethren cannot be undermined. Indeed, such cultural amity is fostered through marriages. If Rajiv Gandhi could marry an Italian, all the fuss about this Gulf marriage was incomprehensible. Besides, the number of girls from Hyderabad who had benefitted by marriage to Arabs far exceeded those who became victims of exploitation”, he said.
amir Mahamoud apologies: But the ex-generals of the Shah Banu war like Tahir Mahmood, and Sattar Yusuf Shaikh, who were subjected to Brahminic SAAMA treatment, came out with startling apologies saying that “such marriages are a sin and have no legal validity under Islamic law. They further said that the Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1929 is totally binding on the Muslims as well. Such marriages are an abuse of Shariat and only give handle to parties like BJP in denigrating Muslim Culture. (Deccan Herald 22.9.1991).
Jam ate-Islami silence: What the nazis call as “second Jinnah”, Syed Shahabuddin, came out with a wonderful suggestion that such marriages should be compulsorily registered. What the nazis wanted to suggest was suggested by Shahabuddin himself. And the leading Islamic organisation, Jam ate-Islami, took shelter behind these statements and silently prayed that no embarrassing question is put to it. So also, the Muslim Personal Law Board. They do not see this as an interference in Muslim Law. We have = all pity for them for their helplessness.
Child marriage not unislamic: Child marriage has been a widespread practice among Hindus, but an exception among Muslims. To prevent child marriages among Hindus Child Marriages Restraint Act was enacted in 1929, under which a girl below 14 years and boy below 18 years was declared to be child and their marriage though valid, was punishable, if one of the parties was a minor. Those who helped and performed the marriage were also punishable. The punishment was very mild ranging from one , month to three months, that was all. Now of course – the age is further declared as 18 and 21 years for girls and boys respectively. This Act was brought to curb the rampant child marriage practices among Hindus — but not Muslims.
When a demand was made by certain “progressive” Hindus to restrain the rampant practice of child marriages, there were apprehension in Muslim minds which were sought to be removed on the ground that provisions of Muslim Law were not be interfered with as Muslim Law was a written and well-established code.
Girls’ puberty age: The Muslim contention was that a particular age cannot be fixed to declare majority age as under the Islamic Law, attaining of puberty was the factor to decide majority, and puberty is attained by girls in hot countries like Arabia at 11/12 years and in cold regions like Scandinavian countries at an age as late as 21 years. And Islam being a universal religion cannot fix a foolish arithmetic age as 14, 16 or 18.
Muslim noble thoughts: Further, under the Islamic law, marriage is not just a personal affair but a social necessity and considered as a rewardable act. The provision of polygamy (men marrying more than one woman) limited to four in Islamic law is to meet social needs like rehabilitating widows, orphan girls, cripples, elderly single woman, having crossed marriageable age, unattractive, uncared for destitutes. Islamic Law instead of encouraging starting of organised orphanages, homes for the aged and homeless, beggar relief camps etc. wanted every Muslim home “to be a place of refuge and shelter for such hapless persons with definite rights, protection, dignity, honour and status. Do not make an orphan, widow and destitute feel humble and humiliated. Accommodate them in your house as wife (with all rights) or as adopted children with limited rights. Such noble thoughts are associated perhaps only with Muslim law.
The child marriage also come under this category. Even before becoming a wife, a girl gets her Mehar fixed, paid or deposited, with not only right for maintenance during the period of married life of her own and that of the husband but also 1/8th of the property of the husband both moveable and ™ immoveable is fixed as an irrevocable share after the husband’s death. It is with these protection and assurance that the father, grandfather and uncle of a young girl are given the right and authority to give a major girl in marriage as ‘wail’. This is an inalienable right, given right from the days of Prophet Mohammed and recognised, practiced and encouraged by all schools of Muslim law everywhere. All books on Muslim law do carry this article of the right of guardians to marry minors.
Jinnah’s initiative: Ten years after the enactment of the Child Marriage Restraint Act 1929, the Qaide Azam, M.A. Jinnah, piloted the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act enacted in 1939, to get formal, legal and universal recognition 10 all the provisions of Muslim Law of marriage, divorce, inheritance, etc. so that any intrusions and misconceptions and mischiefs in present and future are permanently blocked for all times to come. The Act also brought many Muslims like the Mullahs of Malabar, the Labia’s Coimbatore, of the ‘Memons of Gujarat, the Kanchan’s of -Punjab etc., who were following Hindu law of inheritance, under this Act . It also eliminated certain obnoxious Hindu customs which Muslims were following as a result of old habits and Hindu influences. The preamble of the Act itself recognises that “Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) exists in the form of a veritable code and too well known ‘to admit of any doubt or to entail any great labour in the shape of research”.
Question to Tahir Mahmood: Thus, all provisions of the MPL (Shariat) existed and exist as a veritable code including the provisions of child marriage. Then, how can Prof. Tahir Mohamod and S.Y. Shaikh say that the Child Marriage Restraint Act applies to Muslims as well and children’s marriage is unislamic and sinful? Why should anybody care for anti-Muslim parties like BJP?
Marriage & sex: The entire nazi agitation on the Ameena case starts on the presumption that an old man will have sex with his 11-year-old wife and it is a horrible thing. Why should anybody presume that there will be sexual relationship upon such a marriage? Are marriages for sex alone? Is there no other purpose other than sex in marriages? The following examples will explain that marriage is not for sex alone but for other purposes too.
GAY COUPLES
- Thousands of non-Americans pay huge sums to “marriage brokers” and get married on paper only : to American men or women, whom they have neither seen earlier nor later. The only object of this marriage ES, is to secure American citizenship. Immediately after securing American citizenship, they also get “divorced” — also a paper “divorce”. The purpose was to secure ATR citizenship (by non- ) Americans and earn money by Americans).
- dike 8 In Britain & US many men live with men under one roof and declare them- selves as husband and wife. There is no element of sex involved here. Such couples are praised and paraded as “Gay”.
- Similarly, there are cases of girls living together as husband and wife particularly in France.
- Recently, the 59-year-old Elizabeth Taylor married a 39- year-old rich business- I H man — not for sex but for worldwide publicity for the groom, and for 2 promoting the sales of a particular brand of perfume. Definitely the element of sex is the least or not at all with a 59-year-old eighth time wife.
- The Iraqi Govt. recently declared a gift of three and four thousand dollars to every war widow and the groom who would marry. The purpose is to accommodate the widows and give them homes. The attraction for the men is the gift and the lack of financial burden to look after the wives as the widows are family pension-holders and Islam encourages widow remarriage.
GANDHI SLEEPING WITH NAKED GIRLS
- After a short period of sex life, M.K. Gandhi took a “vow” not to have sex with his wife for a major part of married life and lived the life of celibacy with his wife even though he slept naked with other young ‘unmarried – naked women to conduct his I “experiments”, after the wife’s death. ‘He said there I was no sex with wife and there were sex experiments with non-wives. Why the Hindus did not protest the sex experiments of the “Father of their Nation?”
- The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956 provides an age gap of at least 21 years for the adoptive father and adoptive mother if they have ~ to adopt a child of the opposite sex. This is obviously I to avoid any sex relationship between the adopting ~ parents and children in the name of adoption.
FREE SEX IN AMERICA
- The prescription of a particular age (above 18 years) for girls is to avoid sexual abuse by husbands ; after marriage. The Indian Penal Code goes to the extent of considering sex with the minor wife as rape. Thus, husbands are controlled and punished. But what about free sex without marriage between teenage ‘boys and girls which is as large as 33% in USA? ~The minds of the law-makers are baffled. Both the I. parties are too young to come within the grip of law. That is to say, a grown-up having sex with his minor wife, can be traced and penalised, but a young fellow makes the law-maker helpless even if he has sex ~ with his classmate, neighbour or cousin of his age ~ and less. The only solution the US authorities could L ‘think of was to compel private gynaecologists to perform free abortions of such girls and later to teach ~ birth control methods to these children and further later to provide condoms free of cost and making them easily available in the high school book shops. ~ This shows that law-makers want to encourage free, irresponsible sex between young children without marriage, and the same act with the consent of their elders through marriage is prohibited and punishable. It is against this foolish perverse thinking and practice; Islam provides marriage of children with the consent 2 of the parents or elders.
MAID SERVANTS
- The husbands of Ameena and Rukhsana could as well have taken these girls as adopted daughters or as maid servants and still had sex with them as lakhs of Indian pot-bellied rich Aryan bullies do. But hey dare not because Saudi law is clear on the point and given them the right to marry minor girls ‘with the consent of their parents. Sex out of marriage J for which is death by severance of the head in the – public market place. Sex out of marriage is a capital offence in Islam.
Bombay red light area prostitutes: Such sexual abuses are a common affair all over the world young Vo have the highest demand in the Red-Light areas ‘of all Indian cities. Sympathisers of Ameena and Ru iwara have no concern for girls of their age rotting in Bombay red light areas who within 5/10 years are thrown outing this strudels with all venereal diseases, & But when an elderly Arab marries a young girl and takes her as his wife providing all comforts during his life and an assured share out of his property under Islamic law after his death, the Nazis cough, mock and shed crocodile tears and the so-called Muslim intellectuals and leaders find no slapping answer to these foolish mockers and go about hanging their heads down in shame. The nazi toilet papers only highlight, prop up and project such ‘intellectuals’ and throw them into the dust bin after their purpose is served.
Challenge to women libbers: We challenge these – Hindu women’s organisations like Saheli and Jan wadi – Mahila Samiti to stop jerking crocodile tears on Ameena and Rukhsana and go to the brothels in all Indian cities and find thousands of girls of their age and rescue them.
The Bombay Red Light area is growing and mora. and more Dalit girls are recruited daily to this world’s biggest flesh market. Not one Hindu organisation cars a penny. But one Ameena brought gallons and gallons of tears in Hindu eyes. Why? Please read the book, Know the Hindu mind.
But we know that such challenges to women libbers are no challenges at all for them. Their purpose is different from what is shown. We know their mind: the Hindu mind.
Some years back when about a hundred people died after drinking illicit liquor in Bangalore and the name of the liquor baron was shown as Sultan (a Muslim name), hundreds of Bangalore nazis had declared in the local papers that they would adopt a child of- each of the victims. But after 3/4 days when the names of the victims were announced and it was found out that they were Tamil Dalits, suddenly the milk of kindness dried up, their bloated livers shrank, their crocodile tears disappeared, and not a single child was adopted. Those who Know the Hindu Mind’. always stand firm like rock against any oddity, publicity and pestering.
Some years back when a Saudi princess was beheaded along with her paramour, Indian papers carried headlines on front pages saying that she was beheaded for marrying a commoner. After a week when the Saudi embassy clarified that she was beheaded not for marrying a commoner, but for sex before marriage, the rebuttal went into inside papers as small item. Some papers even ignored the news. The recent chastisement of prominent newspapers by the Press Council for publishing false figures about the Ayodhya killings in October 1990 is a standing proof of the poison in our Hindu press
Muslims have no press: Yes. The Hindu press is – publishing falsehood to tarnish the Muslims. But have the Muslims any press to publish the truth? None. the Hindus are doing their duty, are the Muslims doing their duty? No.
The long-range motive behind these falsehoods is very sinister and mischievous and highly dangerous to Islamic culture and values.
In Muslim marriages, the bride does not come in the open. Her consent is obtained through her vakils (advocates) and witnesses who are her close relatives. The entire gathering and the gazes believe the version given by the vakils and witnesses. But if the Qazi’s, vakils and witnesses are harassed for abetting a child marriage, as those involved in the . Ameena and Rukhsana affairs are harassed, the . « @qazi and the gathering will be compelled to call the girl in their presence, look at her face in the open to ascertain her age and even in some cases to look at her bosom to be fully satisfied out of fear of prosecution. What a horrible impact upon Islamic culture and values. To obviate this, perhaps Muslims -will be compelled to go to the Marriage Registrars *instead of calling the gazes.
Spanish experiment to exterminate Muslims: That means the end of the Islamic sharbat. That means the end of the Islamic identity. That means the end of Islam in India.
This is what we had warned long back about the Hindu nazi bid for Spanish experiment to exterminate Muslims in India (“How to Exterminate Muslims in India?” DV edit. May 16 1985) And the DV prophecy is coming true.
And worse than that, in any marriage function, the Hindu officials may dash in and demand exhibition of the girl, and proof of her age through school . certificate, medical certificate and suspecting still may resort to their own methods of satisfying the girls age just as Indian women in Heathrow Airport, London, are subjected to pregnancy test.
What could not be achieved through amendment to Muslim Personal Law, through the Shah Banu «campaign, will be achieved through this slow poisoning tactics.
The Spanish formula of Isabella and Ferdinand in the 16th century to destroy Muslim Law and Muslim culture was the same.
No Muslim woman is safe: The way in which the Hindu air hostesses took law into her own hand to lift the veil of Ameena to satisfy herself will be repeated everywhere. Railway guards, bus conductors, policemen, civil right heroes, Hindu women libbers in every street and every town may demand and lift the veil of any Muslim woman in burger going with her father, uncle and grandfather on suspicion of being a wife, with the onus of proving otherwise upon the parent and girl.
To avoid these risks, Muslims may be compelled to give up burqa itself which is one of the objects of nazis.
The Ameena case, therefore, proves to be the most cunning and treacherous Hindu nazi bid to penetrate deep into Muslim private, personal lives. It is more serious than Shah Banu, more dangerous than Babri Masjid. Muslims are warned.
Suspend the airhostess: We call upon the Muslim intellectuals and Islamic scholars and the goat’s seriously think over such danger potentials, and nip the mischief in the bud. The first in the series should be to suspend the airhostess who lifted the veils of Ameena, and departmentally proceed against her as she is not authorised to do that since she is not appointed as Child Marriage Prevention Officer as contemplated under Section 13 of the Act. We also call upon the govt. to withdraw all cases connected with these marriages and other similar marriages and y put an end to interference in Muslim Laws.
We want to warn all those Hindu “lovers of young Muslim brides”, that parents have always been and are the greatest protectors, promoters and lovers of the interests of their children. No sovereign leader, organisation or society can replace them. Parents know the merits and defects of their children and their solution better than anybody. The world is full of poor, ugly, crippled, handicapped, diseased foul-smelling, dirty, hungry children whose sight is hated by the society. But their parents hug them, tender and protect them. And there are hawks around them to exploit and use them. Parents would not marry their children unless they are sure that their life would be better. One meal a day, a pair of clothes in a year and sex life for a few days in life is a sufficiently better life and great luxury to millions of Indians and parents themselves cannot provide such “comforts”.
Black lies of the Hindu press: Some parents want their children to be married at any cost to prevent them from going astray, others do not care for marriage even if their daughters go on prostituting, some parents lose their everything to marry their daughters to earn by whatever means and provide luxuries to them. These depend upon their own individual perceptions, family traditions, influences of their elders, individual likes and dislikes, which cannot be snatched away or replaced by law. Law cannot penetrate so deep into people’s homes, hearts and beds.
Ameena’s age was found to be 13 years by bone structure examination, but the Hindu press still went on speaking of 11 years.
Even if these young wives are used for sex, what is wrong? There are sex perverts who satisfy their desires with such young girls in massage parlours, brothels and five-star luxury hotels — all stealthily, taking no responsibility upon themselves. The arms of law cannot go into these safe forts as those involved are highly rich and heavily bribed, straight forward persons.
Why old marry young girls: An old man may still need a young girl to kneed his aching body, to apply medicine on an unreachable part of his body to “give him some other physical and mental comforts. The same could be provided in massage parlours and nursing homes, but he is not rich enough to bear the high costs. So, he marries a poor girl and compensates by love, affection, money, comforts and insurance for her future. Is it not preferable for a girl to accept this instead of begging or going to brothels and massage parlours?
If the Indian Muslims refuse to get their girls married, who cares. The world is wide. Bangladeshi Muslims “may give and even if they do not, there are many Afro-Asian countries to meet the demand. Even if everybody refuses, the needy need not worry. Brothels, five-star hotels and massage parlours are in plenty in all “advanced” countries. The only difference is that instead of the girls and their parents, brothel-keepers and hotel-owners will get the major portion of payments, and instead of becoming wives with property rights, and perquisites, the same girls will become prostitutes.
Aligarh movement: Of course, Muslims will not act as pimps and lose everywhere. We warm the Muslim elites. You cannot force the enemies of Muslims by religious/Islamic knowledge alone. Research organisations consisting of experts on various subjects and also experts on Islamic knowledge ‘are the need of the day to counter the conspiracies against Islam and Muslims. While starting the Aligarh movement, Sir Syed did not mean that Muslims should learn the modern European sciences and arts to become government servants but to use the European laws, literature, philosophy, sciences and art to counter them, to use the weapons of the enemy against the enemy. The earlier -generations of Maulanas and Moulavi’s were great authorities on secular subjects. Moulana Mohammed ‘Ali was an Oxford MA (ICS), Moulana Hasrat Mohani ‘was. a double MA, LLB, Moulana Zafar Ali Khan was an MA, Moulavi Mohammed Ali was an MA LLB – to name a few. Great doctors of secular learning like ‘M.A. Jinnah, Dr. Igbal, Justice Ameer Ali, Sir Zafarullah Khan, Badruddin Tyabji etc. where great authorities on Quran as can be seen from their writings. The great scholar Moulana Moduli was inspired, guided and encouraged by Dr. Igbal, who never claimed to be a Moulana in spite of his “astounding knowledge of Islam. After Moduli, there is a void which has not been filled up.
present-day secular scholars do not have Quranic knowledge and the Maulanas do not have knowledge of secular subjects. The lack of knowledge has put an end to research and given. rise to intellectual “anarchy and arrogance among Muslim elites.
‘Muslim Personal Law Board faults: The Muslim Personal Law Board dominated by the Maulanas while leading the anti-Common Civil Code agitation did not think of consulting two ex-Chief Justices of + India — Justice H.M. Beg and Justice Hidayatullah. ~ The result is that the Muslim Women’s (Right on Divorce) Act, enacted to counter the Shah Banu judgment is differently interpreted by Muslim judges and Hindu judges: the former holding the view that it is to nullify the effect of Shah Banu judgment and the latter say that it is to extend and codify the recommendations of it. A simple preamble to the Act could have sealed the issue for all time to come. What was achieved by the sacrifices of millions of masses was put to jeopardy by the Muslim Personal Law Board.
The Ameena episode should be an eye-opener and make the Muslims rethink on strategy and tactics to counter the slow, systematic and deadly effect of our poisonous Hindu nazi press which has become more powerful than the Govt. itself.
