This issue of the Free Arab Voice (FAV) is dedicated to the examination of different aspects of the relationship between the nazi and the zionist movements. You shall find below .an important document worth keeping in your records for future reference.
FAV Editorial: The modern relevance of nazi- .zionist cooperation
One might ask why we would want to occupy ourselves with nazism, a. half-century-old European phenomenon. But this is not really something that we are free to choose. When Assad puts pressure on the »Pope to condemn the current crimes of zionism, or says that the crimes of zionism are even worse than those of the nazis, we hear voices from everywhere — not only from zionists but even from friends of the Palestinian people — that Assad is a crypto-nazi.
“Arab Hitler”: When Saddam Hussein threatens US domination over the Arab world, he is immediately branded the “Arab Hitler” — and this is enough to put at ease the conscience of the average European or American about the crimes committed against the Iraqi people and the Arab nation in general.
Historians, who investigate the established truth about the nazi concentration camps, are threatened with heavy fines, jail sentences or physical-attacks by thugs — all this in democratic Europe not in some Third- ¥ world country where limits on the freedom of speech are taken for granted — and these attacks are of course placed under the mantle of “anti-nazism”. On the other hand, pointing out the obvious similarities between the zionists methods and those of the nazis, is considered indecent, to say the least.
Fascism in the West: It would not be an exaggeration to say that anti-fascism is the official ideology of the democratic regimes of Europe and North America — a kind of founding myth to use Garaudy’s expression, of the current world status quo. At the same time, the actual practice of these regimes — economic, social, military — resembles more and more the practice of the fascist regimes of the 1930s with obvious differences caused by the changed. Circumstances in > which these regimes operate. Under the cover of their loud anti-fascism, they often feel safe enough to go as far as to adopt-unaltered the slogans of old fascism {New Order, Desert Fox).
Homeland for Jews: Of course, one of the most important uses of the anti-fascist ‘mythology is the justification of the crimes: of the zionists, especially after the creation of the zionist state. The propaganda goes like this:
“The worst crime of nazism was the holocaust: the extermination of 6 million, of Jews, most of them in gas chambers. This showed once and for all that the Jews must have a national home of their own, where they will be safe from such persecutions. Whatever objections one may have to specific practices of the lsraeli state, the need for its existence cannot be denied”.
Zionism defended: It is extremely important to debunk this aspect of anti-fascism because it offers the moral cover for the existence of the zionist state and ‘its crimes, which in turn prevents the emancipation of the Arab world from imperialist domination. We have already written about historical revisionism; a current of historical research that has undertaken to examine the accepted truth about the holocaust, the 6 million figure and the gas chambers and has found very little.
Nazi collaboration: In this issue we present a well- researched article by Mark Weber, which shows that zionism, instead of being a reaction to the crimes of nazis, was in fact an accomplice to these crimes.
Israel, the state that was ostensibly created as a reaction to the nazism, has been ruled by the same zionists who have actively collaborated with the nazis.
Disproving thus the basis of the zionist argument, historical research denies- zionists any moral justification, not only for the specific crimes they have committed over the last 100 years, but for the greatest crime of all, the establishment of a colonial state in the heart of the Arab world, with the express purpose of preventing its emancipation.
Notes:
(1)’in July 1998, Jurgen Graf, was sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment and a heavy fine by a Swiss court because of his writings. Rather than serve this term, Graf left Switzerland declaring that he does not intend to return until normakhrights of free speech and free intellectual inquiry are restored.
(2) In February 1998, French revisionist writer Roger Garaudy was fined the equivalent of $40,000 for his writings.
(8) Robert Faurisson, the foremost French revisionist historian, has been assaulted more than ten times.
On Sept.19, 1989, he was nearly killed by Jewish thugs. These are but three examples of the treatment reserved by anti-fascists for those who dare question their dogmas.
