Jawaharlal Nehru is said to be a ‘socialist’. About Nehru’s socialism, Sardar Patel said: “There are as many varieties of socialists in the country as there are of Brahmins”.
Ram Manohar Lohla, the greatest socialist leader of India, said “Parasu Ram, the mother killer, and Nehru, the nation – killer, both belong to the Vasista cult of brahminism” (caste system).
Nehru is also said to be a “nationalist”. But he too performed shard on the banks of the river Ganga when his wife Kamala died. In his “will” he required on his death that part of his ashes should be thrown into the Ganga.
Then what “ist” he might be? Hindu political leaders are said to be “political radicals and social toories and never disown Hinduism” (which created the caste system).
Governing class: Then what about Nehru? In the 1937 elections, in all Hindu provinces the Prime Ministers (Chief Ministers) were Brahmins. In all Hindu provinces, if the non-Hindu ministers were excluded, the cabinets were wholly composed of Brahmins. This was particularly so in Nehru’s United Province, the province to which he belonged. In 1947, because the Brahmins constituted the governing class at the time of independence, they were able to become the Prime Ministers and Chief Ministers in all states.
Can anybody say that the Brahmins occupied the above top-most posts at the Centre and States without the knowledge of Nehru? Certainly not. Then he must be a casteist. Then how can a casteist be a “national” leader? So, he is a Brahmin leader but not a “national” leader.
The great humanist, Periyar E.V. Ramaswamy, said: “The interest of a brahmin is communal but the interest of a sudra is individual”. He said these words about 50 years back and they are correct even to this date.
Congress, the main culprit: The Congress is the biggest brahmin party of India. P.V. Narasimha Rao, the Niyogi brahmin, is continuing as Prime Minister (Congress) at the Centre happily with the direct and indirect support of the other brahmin parties and organisations. Their aim is “Hindu Rashtra” and their man must be in power whoever he may be. But in Andhra Pradesh within a period of three years two sudra chief ministers were replaced. In the disturbances created for the “change”, 300 people lost their lives in Pata Basti (Hyderabad). A third sudra chief Minister has taken over. Why these changes? Sudras interest is only individual, as Periyar said.
Churchill’s prediction: Discussion was going on in the House of Commons on Indian Independence Bill. Then the great Churchill said:
“If independence is given to India, power will go into the hands of rascals, rogues and free-booters. Not a bottle of water or a loaf of bread shall escape taxation, only the air will be free and the blood of these hungry millions will be on the head of Atlee.
These are men of straw of whom no trace will be found after a few years. They will fight among themselves and India will be lost in political squabbles. (13.9.1987, Uayam)
On account of the fight for power among the Congress groups in AP, the first Chief Minister Chenna Reddy, was replaced by N. Janardhana Reddy. Again, Janardhana Reddy was replaced by K. Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy who is the third chief minister in three years. Can anybody refute the words of Churchill spoken 45 years ago?
