Bangalore: The “Hindu tolerance”, much- publicized all over the world, is so deep and widespread that it will not tolerate even a judge heading a human rights body. This is the case of Justice Ajit Singh Bains who is put in the jall.
But Bains is a Sikh and Sikhs are anti-national.
How can anti-national be tolerated?
But he was a High Court judge and heading the Punjab Human Rights Organisation.
So what ? The Sikh human rights comes in conflict with Hindu human rights.
And since this is “Hindu India””, the “Hindu tolerance” will not tolerate anybody challenging the Hindu human rights.
Does It mean Hindu human rights can violate Sikh human rights? Will not such an act violate the Constitution of India?
May be. “Hindus” will not care. “Hindu tolerance” will not tolerate even the Constitution of India if it conflicts with “Hindu tolerance”.
