Just as DV blasted Jyoti Basu, EMS, Varavara Rao and Prachanda, it is extremely important to expose the Bengali Brahmin, Kanu Sanyal, who died recently and also his fake Marxism-Leninism. Unmasking of such corrupt Brahmin marxists is absolutely essential. In May 2007, Bengali journalist Avijit Ghosh asked founder of the CPI (ML), Kanu sanyal: “Did you meet Mao secretly in 1967?”
Source: http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Addictions/entry/when-I-met-Kanu-Sanyal
Kanu Sanyal’s answer was: “Yes. It was a 45-minute meeting. We went by road to Kathmandu. From there Chinese comrades took us by jeep to Peking. We stayed in Tibet too. We reached China on Sept. 30. The next day we saw them celebrate October 1 as National Day. I could see people weeping after seeing Mao. We met Mao, Chou En Lai and the commander in chief. Mao’s advice was: whatever you learn in China, try to forget it. Go to your own country, try to understand the specific situation and carry the revolution forward.”
But did Kanu Sanyal really study the specific situation in India as Mao directed? No. Never did Kanu Sanyal do that honestly in his lifetime. If he had done so, he would have understood the peculiar and complex dynamics of the caste system. Why did he fail in analysing the specific situation in India? Why did he fail to understand the social structure of India comprising the ascending order of reverence and descending degree of contempt? Even when he led Naxalbari struggle, why did he not notice the caste and ethnic patterns of Bahujan exploited landless and Brahminical landlords?
MECHANICAL MARXISM
Even after so much of grassroots level practical political experience, how did he fail to understand the basics like Brahminised OBC Yadavs kill Dalits? Or that in Khairlanji, it is the OBC Kunbis who killed a Dalit family? How is it that he managed to miss the caste struggle in all Marxist-Leninist parties? Is this due to sheer intellectual dishonesty or intellectual incompetence?
Or does it have much to do with the Brahminical way in which Kanu Sanyal was conditioned? Did his Brahminical conditioning destroy or subvert his efforts to study Indian reality? Did he deliberately ignore and hide this reality because he was a Brahmin? These are questions which every genuine Marxist revolutionary should ask. When socialist Lohia could say that “Caste is Class” openly and when CPI’s own Brahmin Chaturanan Mishra also said that if communists had understood caste, they would have captured power in India, why is it that other Brahmin communists never managed to officially formulate a “caste war” theory suited to the “specific situation of India” as Mao put it? What stopped Brahmin marxists from doing this?
BENGALI WANDERING BEGGARS
Is this because Brahmins are by nature mechanical and metaphysical in their approach, and incapable of materialist thinking?
The fact is it is much easier to become an atheist or communist politically – rather than give up casteism altogether in all its forms: socially and culturally. Several rich people are atheists. Naastik or atheist philosophy is followed by several Brahmins. But will they ever give up their socio-economic and cultural privileges voluntarily?
It is because these social privileges give them a distinct and unfair advantage. Similarly, upper caste status also gives both social, economic, sexual and psychological privileges. No Brahmin will give up his social and cultural privileges, even if he surrenders his entire property in typical Brahminical fake ascetic fashion – just like EMS. They renounce everything to conquer.
Bengali Brahmins are literally supposed to be wandering beggars – but in reality, they are absentee landlords who always pretend to be “poor Brahmin” ascetics. In reality, these wandering Bengali Kulin Brahmins used to beg for land, and whenever they “beg”, people have to part with their land to these de facto absentee Brahmin landlords. This is how Brahmins became Bengal’s biggest landlords. So why did they keep on wandering? To “beg” for more land. Not only that, it was considered a “privilege” to give away young daughters to such wandering Kulin Brahmins, especially when they “beg” for it. Why? Because, in this birth itself, Jati ascent will be made possible. So, these Brahmins used to literally wander throughout Bengal to acquire land and screw young girls, who would then be abandoned. These young girls used to perpetually await their aged Brahmin lords and masters who used to rarely visit them – only to screw them and impregnate them – and then abandon them again. Once these roving Brahmin stud bulls died, the girls were forced to commit sati.
SOMNATH CHATTERJI AS STUD BULL
It is from one such roving Brahmin stud bull family that our sacked CPM leader Somnath Chatterjee comes from. His father, N.C. Chatterjee, was a lawyer and a roving stud bull who was also a Hindu Mahasabha leader. In fact, Sushma Swaraj of the BJP even reminded him of this fact on the floor of the Lok Sabha telling: “Somnath, despite your father being in Hindu Mahasabha, how come you are in CPM and not with us in the BJP?” Sushma has still not understood that these Brahmins have merely changed their tactics
They have dumped poor and ineffective traditional Brahminical Hindutva strategies to adopt the much more effective and sophisticated Marxist strategies. They keep on changing their strategies and tactics, without forgetting their caste interests and caste objectives. Ends justify the means.
M.N. ROY STUNTS
Brahmins like Somnath Chatterjee and that pioneer of communism in India – Manabendra Nath Roy (M. N. Roy) who was in the Comintern during Lenin’s time and then became a so-called “radical humanist” revisionist, merely changed tactics to keep Brahminism alive. M.N. Roy was a Bhattacharya. Manabendra Roy was merely his assumed name and party name.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manabendra_Nath_Roy Manabendra Nath Roy (Bengali), March 21,1887 – January 25. 1954), born Narendra Nath Bhattacharya, popularly known as M. N. Roy, was a Bengali Indian revolutionary, internationally known political theorist and activist, founder of the communist parties in Mexico and India. He later denounced communism, as exponent of the philosophy of Radical Humanism, Oxford University Press, UK, has already published his works in four volumes and the fifth is in the press. After pursuing his search of arms through Asia, Naren reached Palo Alto, and changed his name to Manabendra Nath Roy to evade British intelligence.
COMMUNIST GARB HIDES RACISM
Brahmins may temporarily give up their economic status, but never, ever will they give up their socio-cultural privileges. Because, they know that wealth will come and go – but social and cultural, as well as racial superiority is everlasting.
Why a Brahminical scum like Somnath Chatterjee, Narendra Nath Bhattacharya as well as EMS and Nayanar take to communism?
Well, they found it a better tactic to mislead the majority Bahujan masses under an ambiguous “class struggle”. Under “class struggle”, they could also claim to be “poor Brahmins”.
Caste nepotism could also go on – hidden under the “class” banner and Marxist phraseology. But under “caste struggle” theory, their caste men will be targeted.
CONVERSION TO ISLAM
But there was that most important reason – due to their earlier exploitation, both in Kerala and Bengal, the majority Moolnivasi masses had resorted to conversion to Islam and Christianity to escape the Brahminical enslavement. To an extent, the masses succeeded breaking the socio-cultural Brahminical stranglehold.
ISLAM DEFEATED BRAHMINS
As a result, three-fourths of United Bengal including today’s Bangladesh became Islamic. All these were Bahujans. The “Hindu” Brahmins became a minority in Bengal. Brahminical trick No.1 was to carve out a “Hindu majority” West Bengal by allying with the British for partition. Here they failed. Trick No.2 was giving up typical Bengali Brahmin terrorism by the likes of Bagha Jatin Mukherjee as well as Aurobindo Ghosh and slowly adopting “marxism”- which was a much better way to fool the Moolnivasis who are still a majority even in “Hindu majority” West Bengal.
If communism had not existed the Bengali Brahmins would have actually invented it, because the If earlier methods were adopted, even in a “Hindu majority” West Bengal, all the Bahujans might become Muslims – destroying their social and cultural hegemony.
This is the reason why Bengali Brahmins took to “Marxism” in a big way. Wearing this mask, they gradually destroyed Marxism and made it revisionist deliberately.
WHO IS KANU SANYAL
Kanu Sanyal was a Bengali Brahmin bank employee’s son from Calcutta. In other words, a Bengali Brahmin urban petty bourgeoisie- turned revisionist.
What is his “revolutionary” pedigree and credentials:
Kanu Sanyal, (1932), is an Indian communist politician. He was one of the founding leaders of Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) formed in 1969. He was one of the key leaders behind the abortive Naxalite insurrection attempt by radical communist to initiate an “Indian revolution” by violent means.
BRAHMINS BECOME REVOLUTIONARIES
Nonetheless, political analysts write that his political paradigm was based on the concept of Jugantar in opposition to the Anushilan paradigm implemented by the Communist Party of India and the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Sanyal proposed that the Jugantar revolutionaries be a highly secretive and cabalistic group who would periodically surface to commit acts of terrorism such as political assassinations and armory raids.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Jugantar
Jugantar or Yugantar (Bengali: Jugantor) (English meaning New Era or more literally Transition of an Epoch) was one of the two main secret revolutionary trends operating in Bengal for Indian independence. This association, like Anushilan Samiti started in the guise of a suburban fitness club. Several Jugantar members were arrested, hanged, or deported for life to the Cellular Jail in Andaman. Thanks to the amnesty after World War I, most of them were released and could give a new turn to their political career, mainly: (a) by joining Gandhi’s Non-cooperation movement; (b) Deshbandhu’s Swarajya alternative; (c) the Communist Party of India; (d) M.N. Roy’s Radical Democratic Party; (e) Subhas Chandra Bose’s Forward Bloc.
This extremist outfit was established by leaders like Aurobindo, his brother Barin Ghosh, Bhupendra Nath Datta, Raja Subodh Mallik in April 1906. Barin Ghosh was the main extremist leader. Along with 21 revolutionaries including Bagha Jatin, he started to collect arms and explosives and manufactured bombs. The headquarters of Jugantar was at 27-Kanai Dhar Lane, then 41-Champatola 1st Lane, Calcutta.
BANKIM CHANDRA, THE TOP TERRORIST
Jugantar had Hindu fundamentalist elements like Aurobindo Ghosh right from the very beginning, while Dr. K.B. Hedgewar was part of Anushilan Samiti.
Both Anushilan Samiti as well as Jugantar were Bengali Brahmin terrorist movements right from the beginning.
Even Veer Sawarkar learnt his weapons skills from Italy’s Mazzini and other genuine progressive movements. Please remember that even CPI implemented the Anushilan Samiti paradigm. Thus, it was typical Kali-Durga worshipping Bengali Brahmin terrorist movement itself which simply changed colours and changed tactics to became the Brahminical Indian communist movement. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Anushilan_Samiti)
What is his “revolutionary” pedigree and credentials:
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanu_Sanyal#cite_note-autogenerated1-0
Kanu Sanyal, (1932), is an Indian communist politician. He was one of the founding leaders of Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) formed in 1969. He was one of the key leaders behind the abortive Naxalite insurrection attempt by radical communist to initiate an “Indian revolution” by violent means.
BRAHMINS BECOME REVOLUTIONARIES
Nonetheless, political analysts write that his political paradigm was based on the concept of Jugantar in opposition to the Anushilan paradigm implemented by the Communist Party of India and the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Sanyal proposed that the Jugantar revolutionaries be a highly secretive and cabalistic group who would periodically surface to commit acts of terrorism such as political assassinations and armory raids.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Jugantar
Jugantar or Yugantar (Bengali: Jugantor) (English meaning New Era or more literally Transition of an Epoch) was one of the two main secret revolutionary trends operating in Bengal for Indian independence. This association, like Anushilan Samiti started in the guise of a suburban fitness club. Several Jugantar members were arrested, hanged, or deported for life to the Cellular Jail in Andaman. Thanks to the amnesty after World War I, most of them were released and could give a new turn to their political career, mainly: (a) by joining Gandhi’s Non-cooperation movement; (b) Deshbandhu’s Swarajya alternative; (c) the Communist Party of India; (d) M.N. Roy’s Radical Democratic Party; (e) Subhas Chandra Bose’s Forward Bloc.
This extremist outfit was established by leaders like Aurobindo, his brother Barin Ghosh, Bhupendra Nath Datta, Raja Subodh Mallik in April 1906. Barin Ghosh was the main extremist leader. Along with 21 revolutionaries including Bagha Jatin, he started to collect arms and explosives and manufactured bombs. The headquarters of Jugantar was at 27-Kanai Dhar Lane, then 41-Champatola 1st Lane, Calcutta.
BANKIM CHANDRA, THE TOP TERRORIST
Jugantar had Hindu fundamentalist elements like Aurobindo Ghosh right from the very beginning, while Dr. K.B. Hedgewar was part of Anushilan Samiti.
Both Anushilan Samiti as well as Jugantar were Bengali Brahmin terrorist movements right from the beginning.
Even Veer Sawarkar learnt his weapons skills from Italy’s Mazzini and other genuine progressive movements. Please remember that even CPI implemented the Anushilan Samiti paradigm. Thus, it was typical Kali-Durga worshipping Bengali Brahmin terrorist movement itself which simply changed colours and changed tactics to became the Brahminical Indian communist movement. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Anushilan_Samiti)
ARMED STRUGGLE AGAINST MUSLIMS
Anushilan Samiti (“Self-Culture Association”, meaning to follow the teachings of Bankim Chandra Chatterjee) was the principal secret revolutionary organization operating in Bengal in the opening years of the 20th century.
This association, like its offshoot, the Jugantar, operated under the guise of suburban fitness club. The members were committed towards the path of armed revolution for independence of India from British rule. Calcutta and, later, Dhaka were the two major strongholds of the association.
This Anushilan Samiti was of ultra reactionary Bengali Brahmin orientation and was formed to follow arch racist Bankim Chandra Chatterjee teachings of armed struggle against Muslims, chanting Bande Mataram. Anushilan Samiti was formed by casteist Bengali Brahmins who hated British for banning their favourite sati and child marriage. The moderate Bengali Brahmin organization was called Brahmo Samaj led by Raja Ram Mohan Roy – which collaborated with the British.
HEDGEWAR LAUNCHES R.S.S.
M.N. Roy was also part of Anushilan Samiti and Jugantar.
http://banglapedia.search.com.bd/HT/R_0243.htm
Guess who else was part of the Anushilan Samiti – none other than our very own friendly
Brahmin RSS founder. Dr. K.B. Hedgewar.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K._B. Hedgewar
Keshava Baliram Hedgewar (Marathi: April 1. 1889 – June 21, 1940) was the founder of the RSS. He founded the RSS in Nagpur in 1925, with the intention of promoting the concept of the Hindu nation. He drew upon influences from social and spiritual Hindu reformers such as Vivekananda, V.D. Savarkar and Aurobindo to develop the core philosophy of the RSS.
He went to Calcutta to do MBBS. After completion, he was drawn into Anushilan Samiti and Jugantar in Bengal, He was also a member of the Hindu Mahasabha till 1929. Hedgewar was imprisoned for sedition by the British in 1921 for a year and again in 1930 for nine months After his spell in prison he instructed the RSS to remain aloof from political activities including the “Salt Satyagraha” (1930) and continue mainly as a social organization.
COMMUNIST BRAHMINS MORE DANGEROUS
Casteist Brahmins simply differ on tactics and not on the real goal. Anushilan Samiti itself decided to change colours and tactics and simply became what came to be known as the “Revolutionary Socialist Party”, However, the Bengali Bahujans had already adopted Islam.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Revoluti onary_Socialist_Party _(India)
RSP is now a Marxist-Leninist political party. Founded on March 19, 1940, it has its roots in the Bengali Anushilan Samiti and the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army. The party got around 0.4% of the votes and three seats in the Lok Sabha elections 1999 and 2004. It
is part of the state governments in West Bengal, Kerala, Tripura.
A major section of the Anushilan movement was attracted to marxism in the 30s. A minority section broke away and joined the CPI
More “educated” and more sophisticated Brahmins realised that marxism had superior methodologies, strategies and tactics to fight the Bahujans.
This marxist mask would also make them the very leaders of the Moolnivasis to effectively mislead them and enslave them.
Kanu Sanyal was from the same old CPI generation which went on to form CPM and later CPI-ML also. It is no wonder Kanu is supporting Nepal’s Brahmin Prachanda.
HINDUS A MINORITY IN KERALA
Whether a Brahminical shudra Nair heads ISRO, or a Brahmin heads a so-called revolutionary party, he can never give up his Brahminical caste privileges and caste character.
In Kerala also, it was not Dalits who formed CPI or even ML parties. It was EMS, KNR and other Brahminical elites who continue to be humbugs.
Bahujans revolted against Brahminism and took to Christianity or Islam. That is how Hindus became a minority in Kerala. Today only the most foolish, politically illiterate Brahmins and upper castes support BJP-RSS. Brahminical elements were forced to wear “marxist” masks, because they lost their numerical superiority.
Caste consciousness is also based on family-based and social conditioning right from childhood. It is a culturally conditioned reflex. It bestows unjustifiable social, economic, cultural and even sexual
privileges right from childhood. Severe psychological damage and brainwashing is done right in childhood itself and Brahminical classes are socialised in that reactionary pattern.
ONLY STUPID BRAHMINS JOIN R.S.S.
Such reactionary patterns become psychological crutches which they can never get rid of even when they are adults. And in any case, who wants to get rid of a superiority complex and a privilege? Voluntarily, it will never happen. Thus, Brahminical elements have to necessarily betray any revolution.
Who is the bigger threat? I think we must be terrified of the modernised, “communist” Brahmin who eats beef, and hates the RSS-BJP. These are the most politically sophisticated and cunning rascals who have realised the backwardness and crudeness of their earlier traditional right-wing methods. Only stupid Brahmins in RSS and BJP will stick to their Hindu fundamentalism.
BEWARE OF “SOCIALIST BRAHMINS”
The moment a Brahmin becomes politically sophisticated and realises the folly of his old ways, he will immediately hate those backward tactics and become “secular” – whether he is from ISRO or “Maoist” Party – or from the American NASA. They are using Marxist tactics and methodology to not only screw up marxism, but also to preserve their caste privileges based on racial superiority
So, we need not fear the BJP-RSS morons. They are stupid museum pieces. But beware of the Vara Vara Raos and Prachandas and Kanu Sanyals. Dalit Voice calls them “Socialist Brahmins”. These guys are the biggest danger to everything revolutionary.
We need not fear honest but stupid RSS-ABVP fellows who tell that they are against Bahujans and reservation quotas and even organise anti-Mandal agitations. But Kanu Sanyal, Vara Vara Rao and Prachanda will give genuine revolutionaries sleeping pills and shoot them dead at point blank range, by betraying them by raising revolutionary slogans.
Maoists actually are split on caste lines. Even then, they have not given up casteism and castiest discrimination. KNR, Kanu and Prachanda refuse to even discuss caste questions when they know the ground reality very well.
THROW OUT BRAHMINS IN COMMUNIST PARTY
They are certainly not fools. But they are deliberately doing this drama. It is simply in their caste interest to be red hot marxists.
Several Brahmins are not religious and several are atheists. Several eat beef also. But on caste, they will never compromise.
Upper castes and Dalit Bahujans can never function in any communist party. Therefore, throwing out the Brahmins from the communist movement is the only way
Fortunately, the existing Brahminical MLM parties are failing. So, a strictly Bahujan-led party can be gradually set up. Such a party’s written constitution itself will openly state all these dangers and also reserve the right of membership strictly for Moolnivasi Bahujans only. No Brahminical element will be allowed to join the party or even be part of its front organisations or mass organisations.
It will state that Brahminical character itself is historically compradorial, revisionist, labour aristocratic and ultra-reactionary. There is no such thing as a Brahmin proletariat – but only a treacherous Brahmin labour aristocracy.
D.V. THEORY OF CASTE STRUGGLE
DV’s “caste struggle” will be officially acknowledged as a distinct Indian phenomenon.
The fundamental questions will be caste and land There will be a thorough caste- based surveys on how land holding and caste status are congruent. Everything will be caste-basted.
Marxism has to be rescued from vulgarization by Brahminical ML parties which have simply reduced marxism to a crude” economic reductionism”. Studies on the Indian superstructure with relation to caste will be taken up.
There will be no “casteless” or “caste blind” trade union under the name of “workers unity”. If it is found that upper caste worker is exploiting lower caste worker, he will be thrashed and butchered mercilessly. “Class struggle” in India will take the shape of “caste struggle” and caste consciousness will be duly acknowledged.
Concrete preparations to begin armed, bloody and most violent struggle in keeping up with present conditions will be made. (Read DSA books, How Marx Failed in Hindu India, Class-Caste Struggle, Dilemma of Class &Caste).
WANTED A NEW MARXIST PARTY
Will Brahmins be able to escape using Gujjars to fight Meena’s, or will a future genuine Maoist party get both Meena’s and Gujjars to butcher Brahminists?
To ensure that the real propertyless proletariat is victorious, a new type of party to coordinate all these caste struggles is necessary.
