“ARYA BHATTA”, BOMBAY
This is with reference to the review, “Congress Party crimes to destroy Sikh identity” (DV April 16, 1991, p. 11) of the book by Ram Narayan Kumar and Goerg Seiberer, an Austrian scholar (Chanakya Publications, Delhi).
No doubt, the Congress is dominated by mostly “socialist brahmins” who are just like a snake in the grass which is more dangerous than the cobra. But sikhism’s decline started with the demise of Sher-e-Punjab where also brahminical forces played an important role by brahmin sing some Sikhs.
The day is not far off when the Sikhs may be called Boddu, Murk, Badhe. These words were used by Aryans against Buddhists out of hatred against them. Buddhists were the rulers of this country and every third Indian was a Buddhist. Now, most of the Buddhists and Sikhs have been brahminesses. As long as the cats continue to fight among themselves, the cunning rats will enjoy.
Anandpur Sahib resolutions: Tramping under feet their own pledge of 1929, the Congress leaders adopted a constitution for “free India” which was not acceptable to Sikhs and as a result two Akali representatives, S. Hukam Singh and S. Bhupinder Singh, refused to sign the document – rejecting it totally. How again the same Constitution was considered anti-Sikh and/or anti-human rights in 1978 by the very same Sikh leadership? What did the Sikh leaders, specially the intelligentsia, do to have a press to counter the brahminical bombardment against Sikhs? Sikhs have no media. The only one media they have is “Dalit Voice”. The Sikh leadership is using it but not supporting it.
How can the Sikhs secure their human rights through Anandpur Sahib resolution by resorting to only agitation, almost ignoring the other two vital fronts – media and organisation? Time, place and situation plays an important role for the achievement of any goal. The Sikh leadership failed to play its role in establishing a media like the “Dalit Voice.”
Aryan rule: The ruling class can’t be blamed because it is doing its duty faithfully as far as denial of Sikh basic human rights are concerned. Such a denial is supported by their holy scriptures – Gita, Manu smriti etc. To them “Aryan means India and India mean Aryans”, because they are holding 99.9% media, over 92% resources of income. Over and above, they have made most of the public institutions’ puppet, including the Armed forces.
The Aryan rulers have launched their dharmas yuddh. The 15% nazis want to keep the over 85% non- Hindus as slaves. The non-Hindus are SC/ST/BCs plus minorities like Sikhs etc. The DV Editor is right – the Hindu word is imposed on most of the 70% of Indians only 100 years ago.
In the light of the above observations, I suggest the following strategy: i) Give the topmost priority to have a media for the non-Hindu majority on the line of Dalit Voice. (ii) Organisation is to be improved and modified. (iii) The Khalsa must stand for the protection of the downtrodden Dalits and persecuted nationalities (Mustadafeen) just as stated in the Koran.
