COMMUNICATION
If you consider Aryans as barbarians then what do you say about Iran, Iraq and Pakistan? Where they not Aryans. But you don’t see any trace of brahminism there. The credit for this goes undoubtedly to Islam, an egalitarian religion of real socialism. In my opinion, brahminism is neither a religion nor any race. It is just a set of principles made by certain cunning rogues for their petty gains to fool others. Brahminism is the worst form of exploitation in the whole world. Will you not agree that these Aryans willingly supplied their daughters, sisters and may be mothers to the foreign rulers? Nazis and Jews have their own dignity. They may be barbaric and cruel but they are not cunning and submissive as India’s Aryans.
Hitler killing Jews: I regard them as ‘open enemies’ unlike the Aryans or Hindu nazis who are neither brave nor open enemies. I recall your superb caption some two years ago: “Honest enemy is better than a dishonest friend”. In the World War II, the Muslims supported Hitler not the American allies. Muslims approved the persecution of Jews by Hitler who believed that as long as Jews existed in the world there would not be peace in the world. This is coming true as the Jews are controlling the Pentagon and CIA, not to speak of Lebanon and West -Asia.
Aurangazeb’s tax: Aurangazeb was the only genuine, true Islamic ruler in the Moghul kingdom. Because he imposed ‘Jiziya tax’ on Brahmins. Why? It is a common sense that tax is imposed on wealthy people. Aurangazeb knew that this priestly class of his time was fooling the Hindu masses and becoming fatter by simply sitting at the temple taking dakshinas and other things. This amassing of wealth by the priestly class was not tolerated by him. That is why he justified his “Jiziya tax”. As it attacked the idle Brahmins, their pen friends (historians) wrote that Aurangazeb was a fanatic ruler and “destroyed Hindu temples ” while glorifying Akbar as a true secular king because he failed to study brahminism and kept mum on atrocities committed against Dalits and Muslim masses. Akbar was fond of girls and the Brahmins had no difficulty in fooling him. Truly speaking, Aurangzeb was a pakka ‘Shariat’ follower as he tried to uplift the oppressed (Dalits).
Akbar’s sufism: Sufism followed by Akbar’s Din-E- Ilahi made Indian Muslims to blindly follow the traditions and customs of Rajputs thereby ruining their economics. Today 95% of Indian Muslim women do not know their rights as ordained in the Koran. If the Muslims had little knowledge of Jihad or self-defence, they would not have been at the receiving end. The sufis with their spiritual power and “tolerance” imbibed many of the Hindu customs and traditions turning Muslims into cowards. Every Muslim should now realise the importance of Jihad or else they would die without any dignity.
To sum up, I would say that Buddhism, Ambedkarism, Marxism can no longer defeat Brahminism, it is only Islam. that can do it. Read M.N. Roy book: Historical Role of Islam.
