Bangalore: This is a slight elaboration of our Editor’s ‘. signed article (DV Jan.1 “93. “Thoughts on banning RSS”)
It is now clear that the Hindu nazi party, RSS, and all its units are against the rule of law, Constitution of India and hence anti-national. There is no doubt about it. This is not our opinion but the verdict of many top “Hindu” leaders and the courts itself.
We reproduce a chain of evidences to prove that the & RSS is India’s most destructive and dangerous force and its existence is a threat to the country’s unity and integrity and the well-being of its entire people, including the Hindus.
“2.5 million cadres: Here is a Statesman (Dec. 15 92) report: The most powerful among the five banned | bodies is the RSS with its active membership of 2.5 million. itis the parent organization not only of the VHP ang the Bajrang Dal, but also the BJP. As Walter K. ‘ Anderson and Shridhar K. Damle write in their study of the RSS, The Brotherhood in Saffron, it is “questionable if the BJP could survive politically without the RSS cadre, and the cadre will not stay unless the leadership “of the party stays firmly in the hands of the brother-hood”. L.K. Advani said on October 21 1987, after an. RSS conclave in which the BJP, the VHP and other front bodies participated, “After all there is a linkage, all these organizations consist of people belonging to the | RSS”. On November 16, the RSS supremo, Deloras, said that its entry into politics “in the near future” was not ruled out.
Judicial verdict: The RSS has been repeatedly indicted by commissions of inquiry for spreading hate ft and for use of violence. If the Jaganmohan Reddy Commission on the Ahmedabad riots (1969) and the Madon Commission on the Bhiwandi riots (1970) exposed its tactics of operating through fronts, Justice Vedavathi’s report on the Tell cherry riots (1971), Justice Jitendra Narain’s report on the Jamshedpur riots (1979) indicted the RSS far more sharply. Most damning was Justice P. Venugopal’s report on the Kanyakumari riots between Hindus and Christians in 1982.
Enemy of minorities: The RSS adopts a militant and aggressive attitude and sets itself as the champion of what it considers to be the rights of Hindus against minorities. It has taken upon itself the task to teach the minority their place and if they are not willing to learn their place, teach them a lesson. The RSS has given respectability to communalism and communal riots and demoralized administration. The RSS methodology for provoking communal violence is…. After spelling it out in five specific details in “training for any kind of civil strife”, he concluded that the RSS, “Prejudicially affects maintenance of public tranquility”.
What Sardar Patel said: On Sept.11, 1948, Sardar Patel wrote to M.S. Golwalkar, the RSS chief, that his organization had spread poison and “as affinal result of. that poison the country had to suffer the sacrifice of the invaluable life of Gandhiji”. In 1992, it was the Ujjain conclave of the RSS on October 27, at which BJP leaders were present, which set the agenda for the Dharma Sansad – “Kirsova” on December 6 -and had the talks broken off thus. A ban is a political as well as an administrative measure. Initiator mean anything the Government must cease to compromise with the forces which the RSS represents. says Statesman.
Hindu “Marxists”: Insite of such severe indictment, why all the top Hindu leaders are having their heart in this Hindu nazi party? Congress, “Marxist’ and all. other political leaders may belong to their respective party. It only means that their body is in that party but solute RSS. The “Hindu” is essentially nazi. This is the secret. What does it mean? The answer is simple.
The RSS represents the alien Aryan “nation” which thinks that the very existence (not the mere well-being) of different Adi-Dravida, Dravida, Christian, Sikh, Muslim “nations” is a threat to its “Aryan. nation”.
The Aryans/Hindus/upper castes are our rulers! in every branch of Indian society they are at the top. Go to any govt. Office, university, college, private firm, media office or professions, they are the decision makers. They are the boss. They also say they are in majority and Hindus form 85%.
Mental case: Still why are they afraid of others? This is called the siege mentality. They are afraid of their own shadows. It is simply a mental case. How can a set of people ‘hose mental balance is in doubt rule a society? And what will happen to that society if their rule is allowed to continue?
Are the “Hindus” at least happy. No. They are divided into hundreds of castes and sub-caste, one trying to annihilate the other. Their mental disease doesn’t show any sign of progress it is aggravating day by day
