The great Dravidian philosopher and revolutionary, Periyar E.V. Ramaswamy, has said that the wood-cutter uses an iron-axe to destroy the forest but he does so only by fixing a wooden handle to the iron axe. This is what every ruling class does to enslave the people. I will try to destroy the might of the people by corrupting a section of the society and using them against it.
Mahmood Ghaznavi in the 11th century was supported by a Hindu general Tilak, Mohammed Ghouri defeated Prithviraj with the help of Jaichand. Babar was invited by Rana Sangha. Akber’s greatest lieutenant was Raja Man Singh, Aurangazeb’s most trusted general was Raja Jai Singh. The British conquered India with the help of Meer Jaffar, Amirchand and Diwan Purnaiah, a Brahmin. The Congress Party was founded by an Englishman. And in our days M.K. Gandhi’s most faithful Muslim follower to break Muslims and establish Hindu rule (as against Indian rule) was Moulana Azad. Jagjivan Ram was used by the Hindus to fight Babasaheb Ambedkar.
Apart from this age-old technique of recruiting stooges by rulers all over the world, brahminical forces in India have four specialised. formulae called in Sanskrit: Sama, Dana, Beda and Danda, which are used for different categories of people.
Sama: The Sama treatment is given mostly to those who matter like intellectuals and men of status. Under this, the victims are praised. pampered, cajoled, begged in endless negotiations.
Every Muslim of knowledge, status and capacity is told that he is a very noble person and as such he should not have been born among Muslims. The gullible fool’s head starts reeling, he gets puffed up and soon he falls into the trap and wags his tail without a bothering to think as to what is wrong with the Muslims after all. That is the end of the fellow.
Dana: If such gullible fools happen to be writers, journalists, professors, scholars, artists they are given the Dana (gift or bribe) treatment under which they are elevated to ‘high’ positions. Another way of bending these Muslim “intellectuals” is to praise them in the brahminical press as “eminent authorities”, publish their pictures, offer them coveted positions. Their heads start reeling. They get flattered and fall flat to the dictates. They fall prostrate even when asked to merely bend.
Beda: The Beda treatment (character assassination) is reserved for the committed, honest and unpurchasable leaders. Those who refuse to bend and budge before the Sama and Dana treatments are called traitors, fundamentalists, communalists, anti-nationals, foreign agents, and all sorts of bad names. Call the dog mad and shoot. Publish press reports saying that they are getting petro-dollars, Arab-money. When such “grave” charges appear in the brahminical press even the iron- hearted will sweat, swoon and surrender.
Muslim scholars, who preach Islamic teachings and morals and preserve Islamic values from brahminic (nazi) influences, are contemptuously called Mullahs which these days has been made to acquire such a bad meaning and a repulsive smell that the Mullahs will themselves disown they are Mullahs. A gullible film actress, Shabana Azmi, was described as an “intellectual” for her support to the Common Civil Code (CCC) and her head got permanently swollen and she is now a permanent fixture at all nazi women’s meet. For opposing the same CCC, Dilip Kumar was called “Moulana Dilip Kumar” and he started tottering.
NAZIS DISCOVER ANOTHER STOOGE
OUR CORRESPONDENT
Bangalore: Even as we started exposing the intellectual dishonesty of one “Muslim scholar”, we read the puff of yet another in the country’s chief Hindu nazi daily, Iqbal Ansari. Reader in Engilsh. at the prestigious AMU, Aligarh, also comes out with a fake theory on Rama for which he quotes the authority of poet Iqbal. Ansari says
Ram. It needs to be carefully noted, stands out as a case apart. The learned and the laity among the Muslims all express respect for him. The tribute paid to Ram by Iqbal, the poet philosopher of Islam, in his lyric ‘Ram’ can be taken as representative of Indian Musli sentiments towards the moral eminence of Ram as a human person and prince, Igbala calls Ram the leader and guide of India, who is the pride of the country. (Indian Express, Jan. 26 1992)
More and more ‘Intellectuals have started prostituting to the Hindu nazis conveniently sacrificing the Muslim Identity. A time will come when all these suckers will be property dealt with by the angry Muslim masses
DV EDITOR RENAMED
The nazis renamed this writer also as “Moulana Rajshekar” because he speaks out the truth without fear or favour. A notorious Pune nazi, Yadunath Thatte, wrote an article in the Maharashtra Times renaming the Editor as “Rahim Khan Sheikh”. Fighting Brahminism is like putting your hand into the beehive.
Danda: The fourth formula, Danda (attack), is reserved for the common, uncommitted easy-going simpletons, petty businessmen and poor workers and masses because, come what may, they are rigid and uncompromising. Muslim and Sikh masses are ready to sacrifice everything for the cause of their religious duty. But the people in the first two categories (victims of Sama and Dana) are made to call their own people the victims of assault, death and ruin as “goondas, mischief-makers and bad elements, anti-socials of our community and their statements are given wide publicity in the brahminical “national” toilet papers. In this, we discuss the role played by the gullible victims of Sama and Dana treatment towards Islam and Muslims.
Delhi Muslim journal: A particular Moulana publishes from Delhi his journal both in English and Urdu (using expensive papers) carrying entirely his own writings A to Z. This much-publicised and highly glamourised Moulana, hailed as an “Islamic scholar” in the “national” toilet papers, finds fault with every Muslim right from the companions of Prophet Mohammed to a common Muslim on death bed in a far off village. The journal is sent mostly free to its readers. We will not be surprised if this Moulana writes a will directing cremation of his dead body just as M.C. Chagla, the most obedient slave of the brahminical social order. Chagla’s funeral was the most celebrated one in which not a single Muslim attended excepting his son. Chagla was followed by Ismat Chugtai, a renowned Urdu writer, who was totally ignored by the nazi journals, during her life time but assumed importance because of her un- Islamic cremation.
Muslim stooges like Chagla, victims of Sama and Dana treatments, are now on the increase through a very well-calculated and dubious nazi move. And we are seriously concerned with this corrupting Nazi technique. Because under this brahminical influence, these “eminent Muslim scholars quote the Quran itself to give respectability to the oppressive brahminical social order.
The Sunday edition of the Times of India (Dec. 22 1991) came out with a startling article, “A Common Past,” by Prof. Tahir Mahmood, the latest propagandist for brahminism. The problem is he is also a member of the Muslim Personal Law Board headed by the renowed Muslim divine, Moulana Abdul Hasan Nadvi.
Latest prophets: This “eminent authority on the Muslim law” says that “Islam in its original form was a seventh century version of the world’s oldest religion which is today called Hinduism”. He tries to establish that Adam and Eve are nobody but Shiva and Paravati. The Prophet Nuh (Noah of Bible) was the ‘Great Manu. Prophet Musa (Moses of Bible) is compared with Krishna on the basis of the similarity of the meaning of their names and their stories. Rama along with Krishna are conferred prophethood with such phrases: “goodmen of great integrity, messengers of peace, seekers after truth, deliverers of divine guidance, social reformers and benefactors of humanity and as per the Quranic terminology they are Hadi and Rasool”.
SHOCKING THEORIES
This itching in the mind of the author who came out with such shocking theories is based on these sentences of the Quran: “To all people on Earth we sent down prophets X-47, XVI: 36 Some of those prophets we have mentioned by name in this book – others we have not. (IV: 165, XL: 78).
The same religion we have established for you as that which we had enjoined to Adam, Nuh and all other prophets. LV: 163, XXIII:23, XLII:13).
Finding fault with Muslims: But the funniest part is this is not a “research” done by Tahir Mahmood but he is trying to sell somebody else’s stuff which is not selling, namely the writings in an Urdu book, Agar Ab Bhi Na Jage To…”. by another Moulana, Shams Niwed Usmani, which is being widely distributed.
The difference in approach is that the Moulana wants to tell the Hindus through their own scriptures that they are the deviated followers of original Islam and they are destined to become Muslims one day. He calls upon the Muslims to preach Islam through the Hindu scriptures.
But Tahir’s approach is apologetic, defeatist as he exhorts Muslims to correct themselves. That is why Tahir’s version found place in the country’s largest circulated English daily whereas Moulana Usmani was totally ignored. We ask these new intepreters of Quran the following questions:
Six questions: (1) Why Muslim scholars have not raised these questions and answered them during the past 1,400 years of Islam both in India and abroad?
(ii) Why these questions are raised only now and in India alone. And that too at a crucial time in history when Muslims are on the receiving end? Is it to butter the so-called “Hindu majority”?
(iii) Was Quran not understood all these centuries? (iv) Why they are worried about the prophets only of India. Why not prophets of Pakistan, England, Canada, Lanka and hundreds of other countries?
(v) Does the word “people” (Ummath to use the quranic word) mean Indians, Pakistanis, etc. Or does it mean identifiable groups like Tamilians, Bengalis, Nagas, Zulus, Dravidians, Aryans, Afghans?
(vi) By India, they means which India? India of today is not the India about 500 years ago. Babar’s India consisted present-day Afghanistan, Pakistan, Punjab, South India totally excluded.
Rama can be a prophet for his followers. So also Krishna for his followers. Buddha for Buddhists, Mahavira for Jains. They can’t be prophets for all the Indians.
Characterless prophets?: Brahminical scriptures say Rama and Krishna are incarnations (avatars) of Vishnu. If so, what about his other avatars like pig (varaha), Narasimha (lion), Koorma (tortoise), fish (Matsya) etc. Are we to accept these animals also as prophets?
Those named as a prophet in Quran is a person of spotless character, far better than any ordinary human being. What about the character and conduct of Rama and Krishna? From where has this “eminent scholar found out that “they were godmen of great integrity, messengers of peace, speakers of truth, deliverers of divine guidance, social reformers, benefactors of humanity’, when even govt. publications on their character have said the exact opposite of it?
Rama always carried the bow and arrows, fought cruel, treacherous, cowardly battles, drank wine and struggled to preserve the brahminic yagnas and yagas. Krishna’s treachery, wickedness and debauchery are all so well known that in Karnataka a debaucherous man is called Krishnavatara.
Pork-eating Rama: We give here some excerpts from the venerable Telugu journalist, V.R. Narla’s book Jabali, published as the Last Word on Ramayana (Bangalore Institute of Research, No. 25, Gandhi Bazar, Bangalore-4), to prove our point:
Apart from pork, beef and meat of birds, what Flame cherished was shrimps, prawns and fishes, 73rd sarga-Aranyakanda. Not only that Rama was a drunkand but also Sita-both were drinking wine (Sundarakanda-sarga 301 (Aranyakanda-47)
Habitual drunkard: “Rama himself pured wine into sita’s mouth by holding a container to her mouth in the same ways as Devendra fed Sachidevi (uttarakanda-sarga 42).
Periyar EVR has given the following character of Rama (Ramayana-A True Reading -Arivukkadal Achagam, Vepery, Madras):
“His amiable conduct towards the people, his father and Kalkeyi wat only motivated by his desire to usurp the throne. He was all along a serpent in the grass. (p.23).
“While departing to forest, he mournfully revealed to his mother: I has been ordained that I have to lose the kingdom, forego the princely comforts and the tasteful meat dishes and to go to the forest to eat the vegetable and fruits (Ayodhyakandam, Chap 20 page 23).
GOD WITH MANY WIVES
“Rama had many wives. Rama’s wives were used to take pleasure in the company of their servant woman. The term Rama’s wives has been used in many places in Ramayana” (p.24)
He called his father “a fool, an Idiot”. (Ayothia kandam 53).
He stealthily killed Vali who had done him no harm.
Killing of Shambuka: Rama disfigured and mutilated many women by cutting their nose, breasts, ears etc. and tortured them Soorpangai, Ayomukhi. (p.28).
The greatest blot on Rama’s character is the killing of Shudra Shambuka, an episode which even our brahminical TV Ramayana dropped fearing Hindu protests.
Dr. Ambedkar verdict: Babasaheb Ambedkar’s book, Riddles of Rama and Krishna (Dalit Sahitya Academy, 1988, Rs.5) which was earlier proscribed on Hindu nazi demand (but lifted later) throws light from Rama’s birth to death and proves that there was nothing in him to make him an object of worship.
Wholesale fornication: in the book Dr. Ambedkar says: ‘His birth itself was accompanied by general debauchery. To give him powerful associates, Gods engaged themselves in wholesale acts of formication not only against Apsaras who were prostitutes, not only against the unmarried daughters of Yakshas and Nagas but also against the lawfully wedded wives Ruksha, Vidhyadhar, Gandharvas, Kinnaras and Vanaras and produced the Vanaras who became associates of Rama. (page 7).
Liquor drinking: In his daily life as king, Rama was not a teetotaller. He drank liquor and even Sita joined with him in his drinking bouts. There were other beautiful women brought from different parts, he sat amidst them drinking and dancing (0.16)
SEX CRAZY KRISHNA
Womaniser: The story of Kristina is not different. His youthful career was full of illicit intimacy with young women of Brindaben which is called Rasaleela. Or all his indecencies the worst is his illicit life with one Gopi by name Radha Krishna abandons his lawfully wedded wife, Rukmini, and seduces Radha, wife of another man and lives with har in sin without remorse… Everyone of his acts whether as a warrior or as a politician was an immoral act (p.22, 23). He had 16. 108 wives (24.25)
Prophet is not myth: Muslim apologists of Islam in their zeal to butter the Brahmins are even losing their balance. Ether they do not know that Rama and Krishna are mythological and unhistorical personalities and their character was not only unworthy of prophets but also of ordinary mortals, or they have not studied the character of prophets as shown in the Quran. So what else we can conclude that Prof. Tahir is deliberately misinterpreting the Quran.
Brahminism with its latest Incarnation as Hinduism is an absorbing plagiary. Things stolen from other sources have been added to old scriptures, and projected as ancient. V.R. Naria and Babasaheb Ambedkar have given umpteen evidences to debunk this “religion”,
Islam in Ramayana: The writing of Mahabharata itself was continued until 1200 AD when the Muslim rule was already established in India. A great part of the Ramayana, which is declared to be older than Mahabharata itself, was written after the completion of Mahabharata Le. alter AD 1200 (round about the days of Qutubuddhin Aibak). Please read Babasaheb Ambedkar’s Writings and Speeches, (vol.4, pages 251, 252, Education Department, Maharashtra Govt. 1987, Rs.40).
Adi Sankara borrowed his oneness of god from Islam which by then had taken deep roots in his birth place, Kerala. He did it to outwit Islam but very carefully called Advaita to attract the Dalits back from Buddhism, which by then had spread all over India, and also to check Dalit conversion to Islam.
Upanishad called Allahupanishad was written during the reign of Emperor Akbar and another Christa upanishad was written during the British rule (page 18, 19 –An Essay on the Upanishads V. R.Naria, Narta Institute of New Thought, No.7, Lambini Road, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-4 Rs.60).
MANU WAS ANTI-HUMAN
Tahir should note that anybody praising Manu should be prepared to accept the wrath, enemity contempt of over 65% of the Indian population comprising Dalits and Backward castes who consider this anti-human Hindu law-giver as their greatest enemy. That means Tahir Muhammed by praising Rama and Krishna, whom Babasaheb has identified as anti-humans, was by his zeal to butter the 3% Brahmins has annoyed the 85% of non-Hindu Indians.
Warning: We hereby warn these Muslim apologists: Brahminical Hinduism is a dangerous anti human, racist philosophy. It has devoured all humanistic religions through sabotage, assimilation and outright violence. The only exception is Islam, the conversion to which resulted in total conversion, lock, stock and barrel.
Tahir must know that among the greatest defenders of Islam of this century there are some who were once Brahmins, Banias and Thakurs only three generations ago Dr. Iqbal’s and Jinnah’s fourth grandfathers wore Kashmin Brahimina and Gujarati Banias. Zulfiqar Al Bhutto’s grandfather and mother were Rajputs. They have found nothing to love and respect in Hinduism, and Jinnah was so outright when Sardar Patel proudly spoke of Hindu culture, that he said: “Don’t talk of Hindu culture. You have no culture except agriculture”
Victims of Hinduism: What is needed to be done by “eminent” Muslims like Tahir is to join hands with the victims of Hinduism rather than the manufacturers of Hindu gods. And the victims of Hinduism constitute over 65% of the Indian population, namely SC/ST/BCS
KOSAMBI VERDICT
Prof. Tahir must be knowing that the brahminical social order. defeated at the hands of Buddhism manufactured two gods Rama and Krishna to woo back the deserting Dalits. Krishna was specially manufactured to mollify the Yadavas who constituted the single largest population in the cow belt. We advise Prof. Tahir to read the book of a Brahmin historian himself (D.D. Kosambi: The Culture and Civilisation of Ancient India Vikas, 1981, page 91 to 95).
We have any number of such Tahirs today. Their only pastime is to praise the brahminical social order (BSO) just for the sake of some petty gains. They don’t know 61 Dalit Voice 3 February 16-25 1992 that the BSO is so crafty and cunning that it will make full use of such Tahirs, suck them dry and kick them out. And by the time these Tahirs realise the damage done to their own reputation-let alone the damage done to Islam not the country as a whole) they will be too old and unserviceable. For the sake of some cheap popularity. petty gains these “intellectuals” sell their souls and become prostitutes.
We know such “Intellectuals will raise lot of dust and then disappear but Islam and Muslim masses will never take note of them. We es Dalits, the closest allies of Muslim masses, will never, ever allow any dent on the Muslim identity. Because, we both are pledged to fight a common oppressor which has converted the whole country into a blood-stained battlefield.
