Dr. Ambedkar has warned us about capitalism. He said.
“Dalits have two enemies. One is Brahmanism and the other is Capitalism and Dalits should never compromise with them”.
So when somebody tries to set up some kind of “Dalit Capitalism” like Nixon’s “Black Capitalism”, which created only traitors like Jesse Jackson, Dalit Bahujans must become extremely vigilant and doubly careful. They must become alert, because otherwise the Brahminical order will successfully manufacture similar traitors from Dalit Bahujans.
Now, the original Brahminical party of Congress is out to increase the number of such traitors using economic tools by creating a sort of permanently handicapped “Dalit Capitalism integrated into the supply chain of the overall Brahminical economic structure.
TWO BRAHMINS
Earlier they created such a traitor Dalit class using public sector reservations (which were never implemented properly) to make us fight among ourselves like street dogs. Now they want to amplify this several times and make us fight over government contracts. The strategy is one of “individual salvation”.
Dalit Voice excels in identifying enemies of the Dalit Bahujans precisely as well as exposing them and targeting them openly.
The names of our latest enemies going round the capital are: Congress Brahmin “economist” Jairam Ramesh and Dr. Sudha Pai, professor at the Centre for Political
Studies in Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University.
MAYAWATI HATED
Both these Brahmin “intellectuais” are behind the latest long-term Chanakyan capitalist economic engineering trap. Taking inspiration from President Nixon’s extremely successful Black African middle class traitor-manufacturing plan of the 1960s called “The Nixon Initiative, these mega crooks have distilled a local Brahminical version of the old Nixonite brew to mass manufacture a new generation of Dalit Bahujan traitors to betray their own class and set them up for eventual and complete Brahminisation
DR. AMBEDKAR WANTED TO BURN CONSTITUTION
The enemy tricks never change. Earlier, they got Dr. Ambedkar to sign on a draft Constitution which he never liked and told the Dalit Bahujans that they must never follow this sabotaged constitution. In fact he wanted to burn the constitution. Then they got Jagjivan Ram, a corrupt Congress Dalit traitor, to pose as a Dalit leader to destroy Dr. Ambedkar’s chances Similarly, today they have appointed the same Jagjivan Ram’s daughter Meira Kumar as the first Dalit Speaker even as they simply hate Mayawati becoming first Dalit Prime Minister.
Earlier, the tool used to manufacture Dalit traitors was job reservation in the public sector which was never fully implemented. Today, their tool is not private sector reservations which they will never give, but the
mass manufacture of a generation of “Dalit Capitalist”, socially handicapped middle class traitors.
The Brahminical cat is out of the bag and the very first inaugural (June 5, 2009) issue of the Indian edition of Forbes international business magazine has carried the entire gameplan to co-opt, corrupt and Brahminise the Dalit Bahujans this time under the name of “Dalit Capitalism”.
MANUWADI MAOISM
They have understood that it is easier to preventively and proactively manufacture such a traitor class from the Dalits rather than give mass employment to them by granting private sector reservations or proportional representation.
Instead of giving us our separate electorate and proportional representation, our enemy has decided to create “Dalit capitalists who will remain dependant on Brahminical banks for credit and Brahminical businessmen for contracts. All this, at a time when the capitalist model is being abandoned even in capitalist heaven of US. All this, at a time when the BSO itself is adopting fake Manu wadi Maoism.
Imagine the height of mischief intended by Jairam Ramesh and Sudha Pai. See, how minutely and carefully they are studying the Dalit Bahujans to destroy our interests so cunningly.
DR. AMBEDKAR WELCOMED COMMUNISM
Even Periyar E.V. Ramaswamy not only got Communist Manifesto translated into Tamil, he even spoke out openly in Favour of communism, which even culminated in the formation of the now defunct Periyarist Communist Party
LEELABAI STORY
Though he opposed communism, Dr. Ambedkar had no problems accepting the fundamentals of Marxism
Our Brahminical “economists” have laid this capitalist trap before the hungry Dalits precisely at a time when capitalism has been discredited all over the world and even Brahmins are unemployed because of it. On one hand, Brahmins are manufacturing fake Manu wadi Maoism, and on the other hand, they are trying to sell poisonous Manu wadi capitalism to the Dalit Bahujan masses to mass manufacture traitors and betrayers.
The Forbes International Business Magazine (http://business.in.com/article/on-assignment/queen-of-the-boondocks/112/0) says:
Leelabai keeps a licensed 12-bore gun and is not afraid to use it. She is a building contractor and needs it to protect her business from hostile rivals. She once stood guard and fired five-six rounds to scare away hoodlums while her workers rebuilt a wall torn down by rivals.
CONGRESS POSTER WOMAN
That was six years ago, just after she started her business. Until then, she made a living crushing stones in Rajgarh district of MP, just one among India’s 25 crore Scheduled Caste and Tribe people. Today, she is a reasonably successful entrepreneur who employs 50-60 people, mostly SC workers. She drives a Bolero and carries a mobile phone. She cannot read but can recall about 60 10-digit telephone numbers from memory.
Leelabai’s break came in 2003 when the then district collector of Rajgarh, J.N. Kansotiya, helped her get a Rs. 1.37-lakh contract under a government scheme to build a yagyasala (prayer hall) and 900 steps at a temple. That leg-up was all she needed. Today she is the poster-woman for the Congress Party which introduced the scheme and nurses ambitions of becoming an MLA
DIGVIJAY SINGH PLAN
Her transformation from a marginal labourer to a construction entrepreneur is directly linked to a supplier diversity programmer set rolling in 2002 by the then Chief Minister Digvijay Singh. The programmer germinated at a state-hosted conference in Bhopal which adopted, among other reform, an agenda to democratize capital to ensure a proportionate share for SC/ST to enable them enter the market economy.
It required state departments and public sector enterprises to procure 30% of their small-value purchases (like office stationery and furniture) from people belonging to SC/ST communities. The public works department (PWD) reserved 30% of works up to Rs. 2 lakh
Such a scheme made good political sense, of course. At 38%, MP has the largest concentration of SC/STs, a vote bank that any political party would die for. That apart, it promised to be one of the most effective affirmative actions of “independent India” that would help unleash entrepreneurial energies of the most oppressed classes at minimum cost to the state. It was the most visionary programmer conceived by a government, says Sudha Pai.
Initial results were promising. Though consolidated numbers for the state are not available, data from the MP industries dept. shows that
of the Rs. 5.56 crore purchases made by various departments in Bhopal in 2003-04, Rs. 1.71 crore (30%) was frome SC/ST suppliers. In the next year, the figure rose to Rs 2.65 crore or 42% of total purchases in the district.
CHAMARS BECOME RICH
This isn’t the first instance of how markets can help in affirmative action with minimal, non-disruptive state intervention. The leather industry blossomed in North India in the late 19th and early 20th centuries when the British decided to source high-quality leather locally rather than import saddles. harnesses and boots from Britain. Numerous tanneries sprang up in Kanpur, Agra and Aligarh, operated by “low caste Hindus”, particularly the Chamars. Industry brought prosperity and Chamar children started attending discriminating, missionary-run schools. That helped create an educated creamy layer and intelligentsia to provide direction to the community. non-
There was no need felt to campaign against the caste system. There was no impetus to militancy of any kind, or mobilizing the depressed classes, writes Sudha Pai in her book, Dalit Assertion and the Unfinished Democratic Agenda.
SCHEME FAILED
However, despite a promising start and obvious political benefits, the scheme began to flounder after the first year. An official in the state’s industries department blames lax monitoring and wayward implementation. Data suggests that it worked well as long as district administrations were sympathetic. But after the government changed, social welfare schemes of the previous administration got short shrift. The supplier diversity programmer was diluted by making only manufacturers eligible to participate in some departmental contracts Reservation in PWD contracts was scrapped.
Now many entrepreneurs who are registered as suppliers are merely fronting for other, more experienced players. Dalit suppliers accounted for two-thirds of the Rs. 3.21 crore worth of departmental purchases in Bhopal in 2007-08. Yet, some Dalit entrepreneurs whom Forbes India spoke to had registered under the scheme but never got a supply contract. Two of them admitted that they had fronted for others for commission.
BHOPAL AGENDA
Chandrabhan Prasad, a Dalit activist and one of the movers behind the Bhopal conference, says a Dalit supplier still finds it difficult to break the stranglehold of the existing set-up. Government intervention is not enough. A meaningful difference can be made only if private companies include Dalits among their suppliers. He says he tried to convince industry bodies like CII and FICCI to promote supplier diversity programmers.
They hardly responded.
The head of Calls affirmative action council, J.J. Irani, was ambivalent about the whole issue.
“I would be lying if I say that we are doing this (supplier diversity programmer). I would also be lying if I say that nobody is doing this
He says, in our Tata group companies we give preference to Dalit sup-pliers if all other things are equal. He, however, declined to give any data,
The Digivjay Singh experiment demonstrates the power of a willing state in bringing about social change as well as the political minefield it creates for the implementer. That the Congress Party was not able to extend the scheme nationwide even though it was in power speaks volumes of the insecurity political parties feel in implementing welfare schemes that have a long gestation period. Social welfare programmers are politically always risky, says Digvijay Singh
CONGRESS CHEATING DALITS
The Congress had promised in its manifesto for the 2004 Lok Sabha elections that it would implement the supplier diversity programmer across the country. However, it never found a place in the Common Minimum Programmer of the UPA supported by the Left parties. A Dalit activist who did not wish to be identified, claims one Left leader said that such a scheme will only help turn the exploited into capitalist exploiters. In this round of elections, the Congress Party again included it in its manifesto.
Meanwhile, Leelabai continues to fight for every scrap of business. She has just won a Rs. 37-lakh contract for a new wing in a girls college in Itarsi Her bid at just 11.5% above the floor rate was unbeatable. Normally, contractors bid at about 30-35% above the base rate. That means she will forsake profits to gain business, a strategy that many start-ups adopt. As Leelabai has proved, ambitious entrepreneurs like her will be Innovative. Their only demand: A market that is fair and plays even.
DEFEATING PRIVATE SECTOR QUOTA
Sudha Pai herself has gone on record that the one of the real purposes of this dirty trick is “reduce the pressure to reserve more and more jobs for the socially backward”. You have it – directly from your enemy’s mouth itself.
The Brahminical cat is out of the bag. It will only have the effect of converting Dalit Bahujans into co-exploiters of their own people. On the other hand, even if this trick does not succeed, such so-called Dalit entrepreneurs can even be labelled as “creamy layer entrepreneurs” and kept out of reserved jobs.
