Bangalore: The Brahminical bid to manage a second term for their blue-eyed boy, Abdul Kalam, has been shot down. But the rulers have not stopped praising the “good man” when they never, ever have a good word for a Muslim. Why the Hindu who hates everything Muslim is all praise for this dark-looking Dalit-converted Muslim from the other end of India, near Kanyakumari? Why is the wolf loving the lamb?
Don’t think the rulers are mad to praise Kalam. There is a method in their madness.
They have their Brahminical “national” toilet papers to manipulate our minds.
Scientists suffer stomach-ache: Bangalore’s Deccan Herald, managed by a Kerala Namboodiri despite being owned by the Backward Caste Idigas, came out with a full-page report on June 8 from its different correspondents praising Kalam.
As long as Kalam was a scientist, his life was made miserable by the Iyers and Iyengars packed in govt. scientific labs. But India did not produce a single Nobel laureate in science after “independence” despite having hundreds of “scientists” doing useless work. All these “scientists” suffered terrible stomach-ache because the “rocket man” came to be recognised as India’s best scientist. The same fellows finally got rid of him by kicking him upstairs. They quietly approached their jati man, Prime Minister Vajpayee, and impressed him that Kalam as a “loyal dog” would eminently suit as President of India. Besides, the Muslim-hating Brahmana Jati Party (BJP) can boast and brandish a Muslim President in “Hindu India” and advertise their “secular credentials”.
Look how they manipulate our minds and fool us.
But why beat the dead horse now when it is decided that Kalam is out? Why is every toilet paper singing the Kalam chorus? There is a method in this madness.
The rulers by loudly praising Kalam are threatening the SC/ST/BC/Muslim MPs and MLAs who are the voters in the presidential election that they must elect another loyal dog like Kalam but not one who would bark at the rulers.
We have answered all questions on Kalam long back.
DV Dec.16, 2006 p.6: “Why upper castes are all praise for Abdul Kalam as a good man?”
