New Delhi: Besides the Babri Masjid at Ayodhya, two more mosques, the Shahi Masjid Eidgah at Mathura and the Gayanbafi Masjid at Varanasi, are also on the immediate hit-list of our Hindu Nazis. That there is no legal dispute at all with regard to the title of the latter two is immaterial to the Nazis. Because the Nazi thesis is: “Hindus constitute 85% population of India. So, whatever we say is right. Faith is beyond adjudication. If Muslims do not behave, we know how to deal with them”. The Nazi march to Ayodhya on Oct. 30, 1990 which was against all norms of morality and canons of social justice, is a vivid glimpse of “we know how to deal with them”. In addition to the said three mosques, there are 3,000 more which await destruction. The Nazi plot is a part of a bigger plan, the plan to ultimately Hinduism or brahminise the multi-religious, multi-cultural and multi-lingual, multi-national character of India. Under the inspiration of Nazi forces – they are just 5% of Indian population – sustained efforts have been made to distance Muslims from Islam. That means destroy Islam. In the name of uniform civil code, Muslim identity is sought to be destroyed, besides periodic efforts at annihilation and assimilation of Muslims. Babri Masjid was a live, functional mosque till Dec. 1949. For the last 500 years, prayers were being said there. It was following the “miraculous appearance” of the idols, engineered by the Nazis, the mosque was locked. It was on Feb.2, 1986 that the entire mosque was thrown open for puja of the idols. Now for all practical purposes, idol worship is being performed in the mosque. The Nazis case is myth, concoction and sheer flight of a morbid imagination. And to say that their argument in this regard is beyond adjudication is tantamount to unreason. It is this Nazi approach that brings them in direct confrontation with the rule of law, democratic norms and secular credentials of the Indian Constitution and our plural polity. Do they mean to suggest that the Nazis are above law because they make the false claim to be in “majority” today? Are they really in a “majority 85%” as they claim? These questions are answered in the DV editorial of Jan 16, 1991). Those who want to read more about the facts on the Babri Masjid, the verdict of distinguished historians, researchers like Sher Singh, IAS, Calcutta, what foreign scholars say on the subject, archeological data, what “eminent citizens of India” say on the subject write to RADIANCE Special issue on Babri Masjid, No.2448, Baradari Sher Afghan, Ballimaran, Delhi -110006
Rajiv Gandhi, formula: Meanwhile, a mischievous “Rajiv Gandhi formula” on the Babri Masjid to refer the dispute to a judicial probe by the Supreme Court has distressed all Muslims and democrats. The Nazi plan is to create a dispute and then manufacture a “public opinion” that it is a “dispute” and later refer that dispute to judicial verdict. Can such a thing be accepted in a country where the thief, policemen, prosecutor, judge, and the hangman happened to be the same person? How can we trust a people who are not prepared to abide by the verdict of court by desperately inciting hatred and violence and even inciting Hindu police and military forces to violate govt. orders? Does it not lead to end of a civilized govt .? India will have to bid goodbye to all secular values and democratic norms and go back to the priest-ridden medieval Manu Dharma Shastra. Destruction of Babri Masjid even with Muslim consent would shame this country and shame the world. It is worse than “Blue Star” attack on the Golden Temple.
